page-loader

NAAC

Criteria II – Teaching-Learning and Evaluation

2.1.1 Enrolment percentage

2.1.2 Percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC etc.) as per applicable reservation policy for the first year admission

2.2.1 The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes to cater to differential learning needs of the student

2.2.2 Student – Full time teacher ratio

2.3.1 Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experience and teachers use ICT- enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and

2.3.2 The institution adopts effective Mentor-Mentee Schemes to address academics and student-psychological issues

2.3.3 Preparation and adherence of Academic Calendar and Teaching plans by the institution

2.4.1 Percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts

2.4.2 Percentage of full time teachers with Ph.D./D.Sc. / D.Litt./ L.L.D

2.4.3 Average teaching experience of full time teachers

2.4.4 Average teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution

2.5.1 Average number of days from the date of last semester-end/ yearend examination till the last date of declaration of results

2.5.2 Percentage of student complaints/grievances about evaluation against total number appeared in the examinations

2.5.3 IT integration and reforms in the examination procedures and processes including Continuous Internal Assessment (CIA)/Formative Assessment have brought in considerable improvement in Examination Management System (EMS) of the Institution

2.6.1 The institution has stated learning outcomes (programme and course outcome)/graduate attributes which are integrated into the assessment process and widely publicized through the website and other documents and the attainment of the same are evaluated by the institution

2.6.2 Pass percentage of students (excluding backlog students) (Data for the latest completed academic year)

2.7.1 Online student satisfaction survey regarding the teaching learning process.

Criteria III – Research, Innovations and Extension

3.1.1 The institution’s research facilities are frequently updated and there is well defined policy for promotion of research which is uploaded on the institutional website and implemented

3.1.2 The institution provides seed money to its teachers for research

3.1.3 Percentage of teachers receiving national/ international fellowship/financial support by various agencies for advanced studies/ research

3.2.1 Research funding received by the institution and its faculties through Government and non-government sources such as industry, corporate houses, international bodies for research project, endowment research chairs

3.2.2 Percentage of teachers having research projects

3.2.3 Percentage of teachers recognised as research guides as in the latest completed academic year

3.3.1 Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations, Indian Knowledge System (IKS),including awareness about IPR, the establishment of IPR cell, Incubation centre and other initiatives for the creation and transfer of knowledge/technology and the outcomes of the same are evident

3.4.1 The Institution ensures implementation of its stated Code of Ethics for research

3.4.2 Number of candidates registered for Ph.D per teacher (as per the data given w.r.t recognized Ph.D guides/ supervisors provided at 3.2.3 metric)

3.4.3 Number of research papers published per teacher in the Journals as notified on UGC CARE list

3.4.4 Number of books and chapters in edited volumes published per teacher

3.4.5 Bibliometrics of the publications during the last five years based on average Citation index in Scopus/ Web of Science

3.4.6 Bibliometrics of the publications during the last five years based on Scopus/ Web of Science – h-index of the Institution

3.5.1 Revenue generated from consultancy and corporate training

3.6.1 Outcomes of extension activities in the neighbourhood community in terms of impact and sensitizing the students to social issues and holistic development, and awards received if any

3.6.2 Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through organized forums including NSS/NCC with involvement of community

3.7.1 Number of functional MoUs/linkages with institutions/ industries in India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training, project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research

Criteria VI – Governance, Leadership and Management

6.1.1 The institutional governance and leadership are in accordance with the vision and mission of the Institution and it is visible in various institutional practices such as NEP implementation, sustained institutional growth, decentralization, participation in the institutional governance and in their short term and long term Institutional Perspective Plan.

6.2.1 The institutional perspective plan is effectively deployed and functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment, service rules, and procedures, etc.

6.2.2 E-governance

6.3.1 The institution has performance appraisal system, effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff and avenues for career development/progression

6.3.2 Percentage of teachers provided financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies

6.3.3 Percentage of teachers undergoing online/ face-to-face Faculty Development Programmes (FDPs)/ Management Development Programmes (MDPs)

6.4.1 Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds other than salary and fees and the optimal utilisation of resources

6.4.2 Funds / Grants received from government bodies, non-government bodies, and philanthropists

6.4.3 Institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly

6.5.1 IQAC Contributions for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes

6.5.2 Institutional reviews and implementation of Teaching learning reforms facilitated by IQAC

6.5.3 IQAC initiatives

Criteria II – Teaching-Learning and Evaluation

2.1.1 Enrolment percentage

2.1.2 Percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC etc.) as per applicable reservation policy for the first year admission

2.2.1 The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes to cater to differential learning needs of the student

2.2.2 Student – Full time teacher ratio

2.3.1 Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experience and teachers use ICT- enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and

2.3.2 The institution adopts effective Mentor-Mentee Schemes to address academics and student-psychological issues

2.3.3 Preparation and adherence of Academic Calendar and Teaching plans by the institution

2.4.1 Percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts

2.4.2 Percentage of full time teachers with Ph.D./D.Sc. / D.Litt./ L.L.D

2.4.3 Average teaching experience of full time teachers

2.4.4 Average teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution

2.5.1 Average number of days from the date of last semester-end/ yearend examination till the last date of declaration of results

2.5.2 Percentage of student complaints/grievances about evaluation against total number appeared in the examinations

2.5.3 IT integration and reforms in the examination procedures and processes including Continuous Internal Assessment (CIA)/Formative Assessment have brought in considerable improvement in Examination Management System (EMS) of the Institution

2.6.1 The institution has stated learning outcomes (programme and course outcome)/graduate attributes which are integrated into the assessment process and widely publicized through the website and other documents and the attainment of the same are evaluated by the institution

2.6.2 Pass percentage of students (excluding backlog students) (Data for the latest completed academic year)

2.7.1 Online student satisfaction survey regarding the teaching learning process.

Criteria III – Research, Innovations and Extension

3.1.1 The institution’s research facilities are frequently updated and there is well defined policy for promotion of research which is uploaded on the institutional website and implemented

3.1.2 The institution provides seed money to its teachers for research

3.1.3 Percentage of teachers receiving national/ international fellowship/financial support by various agencies for advanced studies/ research

3.2.1 Research funding received by the institution and its faculties through Government and non-government sources such as industry, corporate houses, international bodies for research project, endowment research chairs

3.2.2 Percentage of teachers having research projects

3.2.3 Percentage of teachers recognised as research guides as in the latest completed academic year

3.3.1 Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations, Indian Knowledge System (IKS),including awareness about IPR, the establishment of IPR cell, Incubation centre and other initiatives for the creation and transfer of knowledge/technology and the outcomes of the same are evident

3.4.1 The Institution ensures implementation of its stated Code of Ethics for research

3.4.2 Number of candidates registered for Ph.D per teacher (as per the data given w.r.t recognized Ph.D guides/ supervisors provided at 3.2.3 metric)

3.4.3 Number of research papers published per teacher in the Journals as notified on UGC CARE list

3.4.4 Number of books and chapters in edited volumes published per teacher

3.4.5 Bibliometrics of the publications during the last five years based on average Citation index in Scopus/ Web of Science

3.4.6 Bibliometrics of the publications during the last five years based on Scopus/ Web of Science – h-index of the Institution

3.5.1 Revenue generated from consultancy and corporate training

3.6.1 Outcomes of extension activities in the neighbourhood community in terms of impact and sensitizing the students to social issues and holistic development, and awards received if any

3.6.2 Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through organized forums including NSS/NCC with involvement of community

3.7.1 Number of functional MoUs/linkages with institutions/ industries in India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training, project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research

Criteria VI – Governance, Leadership and Management

6.1.1 The institutional governance and leadership are in accordance with the vision and mission of the Institution and it is visible in various institutional practices such as NEP implementation, sustained institutional growth, decentralization, participation in the institutional governance and in their short term and long term Institutional Perspective Plan.

6.2.1 The institutional perspective plan is effectively deployed and functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment, service rules, and procedures, etc.

6.2.2 E-governance

6.3.1 The institution has performance appraisal system, effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff and avenues for career development/progression

6.3.2 Percentage of teachers provided financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies

6.3.3 Percentage of teachers undergoing online/ face-to-face Faculty Development Programmes (FDPs)/ Management Development Programmes (MDPs)

6.4.1 Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds other than salary and fees and the optimal utilisation of resources

6.4.2 Funds / Grants received from government bodies, non-government bodies, and philanthropists

6.4.3 Institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly

6.5.1 IQAC Contributions for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes

6.5.2 Institutional reviews and implementation of Teaching learning reforms facilitated by IQAC

6.5.3 IQAC initiatives